This notice provides current guidance to Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) aviation safety inspectors (ASI) on program policies and procedures for
reexamining individuals holding pilot certificates with various ratings who were tested by
Michael A. Puehler of Cincinnati, Ohio. The reexamination will ensure that these individuals
meet the standards of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 61 to hold their
certificates and/or ratings.
Stage: Final Publications
Regulatory Agency Final Publications
FAA N8900.555
FAA N8900.554
FAA N8900.553
ED Decision 2020/010/R General Acceptable Means of Compliance for Airworthiness of Products, Parts and Appliances (AMC-20) — Amendment 19
The objective of Decision 2020/010/R is to provide state-of-the-art means for showing compliance with the applicable requirements with regard to the following:
- reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation;
- certification of products and parts equipped with electronic control systems;
- certification of in-flight entertainment (IFE) systems;
- certification of airborne electronic hardware (AEH);
- management of open problem reports (OPRs).
These amendments to AMC-20 are expected to facilitate the certification and the occurrence-reporting processes. Overall, they would bring safety and economic benefits, and have neither environmental nor social impacts.
In addition, Decision 2020/010/R creates a consolidated index table showing all the AMC-20 guidance issued by EASA. This is expected to increase transparency and facilitate the application of those AMCs.
EASA Change Information — AMC-20 Amendment 19
EASA explanatory_note_to_ed_decision_2020-010-r
EASA ed_decision_2020-010-r
EASA AMC-20 Amendment 19
ED Decision 2020/011/R CS-ETSO — Amendment 16
This Decision introduces amendments to CS-ETSO taking into account the principles of efficiency and harmonisation.
It introduces into CS-ETSO new, updated and improved standards for parts and appliances, as follows:
- a number of European Technical Standard Orders (ETSOs) have been modified in order to harmonise them with the corresponding FAA TSOs;
- one new ETSO (Index 1) has been introduced, which is, where possible, technically similar to the existing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Technical Standard Order (TSO); and
- some new ETSOs (Index 2) have been introduced, which either do not exist in the FAA TSO series, or which contain significant technical differences from the corresponding FAA TSOs.
These amendments are expected to reduce the regulatory burden for the validation of FAA TSO authorisations by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and vice versa, to increase cost-effectiveness of compliance demonstrations and to reflect in CS-ETSO the technical state of the art.
EASA explanatory_note_to_ed_decision_2020-011-r
EASA ed_decision_2020-011-r
EASA change_information_-_cs-etso_amendment_16
EASA cs-etso_-_amendment_16
FAA Extension of Exemption No 18510B – Part 135 Limited Relief from Timeframes for Completing Recurrent Training and Qualification Requirements for Ground Personnel and Crewmembers
By letter dated July 9, 2020, you petitioned the FAA on behalf of the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) and its members for an extension of Exemption No. 18510A. That exemption from §§ 135.245(c), 135.247(a), 135.301(a), 135.323(b), 135.337(g), 135.338(g), 135.339(b), 135.340(b), and 135.505(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) provides limited relief from the timeframes for completing recurrent training and qualification requirements for ground personnel and crewmembers1 due through July 31, 2020.2
In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.3 You request that the exemption be extended to provide relief from the timeframes for completing recurrent training and qualification requirements for ground personnel4 and crewmembers due through January 31, 2021.5