Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.
Stage: Final Publications
Regulatory Agency Final Publications
ed_decision_2020-016-r
ED Decision 2020/017/R Amendments to the Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Regulation (EU) 2017/373
The objective of this Decision is to maintain a high level of safety in the provision of air traffic management (ATM)/air navigation services (ANS), especially air traffic services (ATS).
Following the amendment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373 (ATM/ANS Regulation) by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/469 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1177, this Decision serves as corrigendum to a specific acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance material (GM) to Part-ATS issued with EASA ED Decision 2020/008/R.
explanatory_note_to_ed_decision_2020-017-r
ed_decision_2020-017-r
amc_gm_to_part-ats_-_issue_1_amendment_3
EASA ED Decision 2020/018/R Amendment to the Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Part-FCL and Part-ARA of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 — ‘Basic instrument rating’
The objective of this Decision is to address the objective established by the General Aviation (GA) Road Map, which is to work towards simpler, lighter and better rules for GA.
The key principles for the basic instrument rating (BIR) are that the training is entirely competency-based and flexible, and focuses on the practical needs of GA pilots, and that the practical training and testing standards are similar to those of the current Part-FCL CB-IR. The competency-based training is conducted through a modular training system. There are four modules: Module 1 is completed first, but the order in which Modules 2 and 3, and — if applicable — Module 4, are completed, is up to the applicant. The new AMC1 FCL.835 ‘Basic instrument rating (BIR)’ provides the competency criteria required for the relevant training modules of the BIR. Each module contains the required individual competencies. It will be up to the training organisation or instructor to determine whether the competencies have been assimilated to the required standard before allowing the candidate to progress to the next module or skill test. This will allow that the difference in learning speed of candidates can be taken into account for their progress.
In the existing AMC1 ARA.FCL.300(b) ‘Examination procedures’, new columns are added in relation to the exam length, the total number of questions, and the distribution of questions per the BIR modules.
explanatory_note_to_ed_decision_2020-018-r
ed_decision_2020-018-r_1
amc_gm_to_part-fcl_-_issue_1_amendment_10_0
amc_gm_to_part-ara_-_issue_1_amendment_10_0
TSO-C106a_PublicComments
TSO-C106a
FAA N8900.568 Living History Flight Experience Enhanced Oversight
This notice clarifies oversight procedures of Living History Flight
Experience (LHFE) exemption holders for Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) aviation
safety inspectors (ASI).
