FAA AC_119-2A Operational Use of Radio Frequency Identification Systems Onboard Aircraft

This AC provides aircraft operator guidance on the use of radio frequency identification (RFID) devices and systems in operational and maintenance environments as an alternative means of performing specific maintenance and inspection tasks in accordance with 14 CFR parts 43, 91, 121, 125, 129, and 135. This AC limits its scope to aircraft RFID applications, where RFID tags are installed directly on aircraft, parts, and components to verify identification, serviceability status, or presence.

EPAS_2019-2023 The European Plan for Aviation Safety

The European Plan for Aviation Safety (EPAS) is built on a proactive approach to support the future
growth of aviation while securing a high and uniform level of safety for all Member States (MSs). This
proactive approach allows the European Commission (EC), the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) and MSs to take the necessary actions at the right time in order to prioritise the risks to be
managed and to face the challenges posed by the increasing complexity and continued growth in civil
aviation, as well as to ensure safe, secure and environmental friendly implementation of new business
models and new technologies.
EPAS is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) to enhance
the level of safety in aviation and to support MSs in fostering mature safety management capabilities.
This EPAS edition captures the GASP goals under a new vision:
‘achieve constant safety improvement within a growing aviation industry’
The overall safety objective is to maintain and whenever feasible to further improve the present safety
performance level of the European aviation system in the face of upcoming changes. In the field of air
traffic management (ATM), the performance ambitions adopted with the ATM Master Plan (ATM MP)1
reflect this overall objective.
The 2019-2023 EPAS edition integrates safety information from various sources, such as the Annual
Safety Review (ASR), the Standardisation Annual Report (SAR), and the ATM MP, which is the European
plan implementing the Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP). The objective is to obtain an overarching,
consolidated aviation safety picture at European level, supporting the prioritisation of safety actions.
More specifically, as safety is the highest priority for the implementation of the European ATM MP,
this EPAS edition embraces European actions stemming from the ATM MP. It thus establishes an initial
alignment with the ATM MP.
This EPAS edition reflects the new priorities agreed for the implementation of the new Basic
Regulation (NBR), which entered into force on 11 September 2018. The related implementing rules
will be aligned accordingly over the following years. The precise scope as well as the near-term
priorities for 2019-2021 were agreed at the June 2018 EASA Management Board (MB) meeting, on the
basis of a roadmap defining on the one hand how the work ahead to adapt to the NBR will be
addressed and on the other hand setting related priorities for EASA rulemaking. While certain NBR
provisions were already considered under the 2018-2022 EPAS edition, the NBR prioritisation has a
major impact on this EPAS edition.
As an integral part of the NBR roadmap, EASA will provide MSs with targeted support in order to
complement the Standardisation activities and to reinforce the common understanding and
implementation of the European aviation safety regulations, thus enabling a robust and harmonised
European aviation system.

Transport Canada – Flight Duty and Rest Regulation

All flight crew experience the detrimental effects of fatigue, whether they are flying cargo or passenger planes, short-haul or long-haul. To ensure the safety of passengers and crew, the Government of Canada sets limits to the amount of time a crew member can be on the job.

The changes to flight crew fatigue management include two essential elements:

New prescribed flight and duty limits that are grounded in modern science and better manage the length of time that a crew member can be on the job (see table below); and
Fatigue Risk Management Systems that will allow operators the flexibility to vary from the prescribed limits based on their unique operations if they can demonstrate that alertness and safety will not be affected.
New prescribed flight and duty time limits (subparts 705, 704, and 703 of the Canadian Aviation Regulations)

Flight time
Previous regulations (1996)
1,200 hours in any 365 consecutive days
300 hours in any 90 consecutive days
120 hours in any 30 consecutive days
40-60 hours in any 7 consecutive days
New regulations
1,000 hours in any 365 consecutive days
300 hours in any 90 consecutive days
112 hours in any 28 consecutive days
Flight duty period
Previous regulations (1996)
14 hours (aerial workers and air taxi operators) or
13 hours, 45 minutes (commuter operations and airline operators)
New regulations
Maximum 9-13 hours – based on start time of day/sectors flown
Rest periods
Previous regulations (1996)
8 hours plus time for meals, personal hygiene, and travel to and from suitable accommodation
New regulations
At home– 12 hours or 11 hours plus travel time, or 10 hours in suitable accommodation provided by the air operator
Away from home – 10 hours in suitable accommodation
Time free from duty
Previous regulations (1996)
36 hours / 7 days; or
3 days / 17 days; or
3 periods x 24 hours / 30 days
13 periods x 24 hours / 90 days.
New regulations
Option 1:
1 single day free from duty per 7 consecutive days
4 single days free from duty per 28 days
Option 2: 5 days off per 21 days
Consecutive night duties
Previous regulations (1996)
Not applicable
New regulations
Maximum of 3 nights of duty in a row without a rest during the night
If a rest is provided during the night, up to 5 consecutive nighttime duty periods
Fatigue Risk Management Systems
Previous regulations (1996)
No Fatigue Risk Management Systems option
New regulations
Option to use Fatigue Risk Management Systems
Coming into force
New regulations
24 months for major Canadian airline operators (subpart 705)
48 months for smaller and regional operators (subpart 704 and 703)
Fatigue Risk Management Systems

Transport Canada is committed to improving the safety of Canadians and to reducing fatigue for all flight crews.

The new regulations recognize that a one-size-fits-all approach may not work for everyone or under all circumstances. They include an option for operators to develop and implement a Fatigue Risk Management System to identify and minimize the sources of fatigue and manage fatigue risk in an operation.

A Fatigue Risk Management System is an overall risk management approach in which air operators:

identify hazards;
assess risk;
develop mitigation strategies;
provide fatigue management training and education;
use fatigue monitoring systems; and
improve processes to reflect changing circumstances and feedback.
A Fatigue Risk Management System provides an alternative for operators that may have constraints meeting the prescribed flight and duty time limits due to the unique nature of their operations (e.g., ultra‑long haul flights or flights serving northern and remote communities).

Example:

A cargo operator regularly flies from A (home base) to community B to off-load a large amount of supplies and then returns to A. There is a long layover at community B while supplies are being off‑loaded by airport employees. The entire route is in the same time zone. Including the time required for loading and unloading, the total duty time for the crew is 14 hours from start to finish.

Possible mitigations under Fatigue Risk Management System that may provide the operator to be exempted from prescribed flight duty time could include:

Providing a napping/rest facility where the pilot may rest during off loading and loading operations;
Limiting the number of consecutive shifts;
Providing a minimum of 2 days off duty each week; and
Avoiding schedules with early starts and late duties;
Over the next four years, Transport Canada specialists will support and work in close collaboration with northern and remote operators to help them develop and implement their own Fatigue Risk Management Systems.

Transport Canada will continue to work with operators to develop and refine guidance material, and build common tools to support their operations. This will be led by a Transport Canada Fatigue Risk Management System Special Advisor and in collaboration with industry through focus groups, workshops, and pilot projects.

The use of a Fatigue Risk Management System requires an organizational culture whereby fatigue risk management becomes as much a part of day-to-day operations as pre-flight checks and keeping pilot log books. A positive and supportive safety culture recognizes fatigue as an operational issue, and encourages open and honest reporting of fatigue and fatigue hazards.

This approach intersects with safety management systems, so air operators who already have Safety Management Systems in place can adapt their processes to manage fatigue-specific risks.

Transport Canada will review all systems to make sure they meet regulations. An air operator will only be allowed to operate flights under a Fatigue Risk Management System if the operator can demonstrate that safety is not affected.

December, 2018

ED Decision 2018/014/R CS-E Amendment 5 – Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Engines — CS-E

The objective of this Decision is to maintain a high level of safety for aircraft engines and ensure that it reflects current
technology and the latest status of the Certification Specifications for Engines (CS-E).
Amendment 5 will improve the ability of aeroplane turbine engines to cope with the ingestion of birds that can reasonably
be expected to be experienced during the service life of an engine.
In addition, it includes the incorporation or improvement of the CSs and the related acceptable means of compliance
(AMC) for:
— a ‘30-Minute Power’ rating;
— the fireproofing of engine mounts;
— ignition and relighting in flight;
— engine casing strength;
— transient fuel icing conditions;
— rain and hail ingestion;
— compressor and turbine blade failures; and
— compressor, fan and turbine shafts.
Overall, it is expected that this Amendment will improve safety and maintain harmonisation with the US FAA Part 33
regulations.