ED Decision 2020/022/R Regular update of the Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Regulation (EU) 2019/947

AMC & GM to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019-947 — Issue 1, Amendment 1
AMC & GM to Part-UAS — Issue 1, Amendment 1

The objective of this Decision is to update the Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 (the ‘UAS Regulation’) and to the Annex (Part-UAS) thereto, as published with Decision 2019/021/R.

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) developed this Decision under rulemaking task (RMT).0730, which is divided into the following two subtasks:

  • Subtask 1a clarifies the conditions under which unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations over populated areas and assemblies of people can be authorised in the ‘specific’ category; and
  • Subtask 1b ensures the interoperability of the national registration systems, which are established and maintained by the EASA Member States (MSs), for UAS operators and for certified UAS that require registration, introduces new predefined risk assessments (PDRAs), and improves the existing PDRA.

The amendments are expected to increase safety, improve harmonisation among EASA MSs, and facilitate societal acceptance of UAS operations in the ‘specific’ category.

ED Decision 2020/021/R Requirements for the provision of apron management services at aerodromes

AMC and GM to Authority, Organisation and Operations Requirements for Aerodromes — Issue 1, Amendment 4

The objective of this Decision is to maintain a high level of safety and to provide cost-efficient rules in the field of aerodrome operations and specifically in the provision of apron management services (AMS) at aerodromes. Moreover, this Decision aims to support the harmonisation of the EU regulatory framework with the relevant International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) provisions (ICAO Annex 14 Volume I ‘Aerodrome Design and Operations’, 8th Edition). It further aims to maintain a level playing field, and ensure the harmonised implementation of the provisions of Commission Regulation (EU) No 139/2014, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1234 which was adopted following the publication of EASA Opinion No 02/2014 ‘Requirements for apron management services at aerodromes’ on 24 September 2014.

This Decision amends the Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Annex II (Part-ADR.AR), Annex III (Part-ADR.OR) and Annex IV (Part-ADR.OPS) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 139/2014.

The amendments to the AMC and GM cover different areas, such as:

  • the submission of declarations by organisations responsible for the provision of AMS and their acceptance by the competent authorities;
  • the oversight of such organisations by the competent authorities;
  • the management system requirements for organisations responsible for the provision of AMS;
  • the AMS operational procedures;
  • the apron safety;
  • and training οf personnel involved in the provision of AMS.

The amendments are expected to increase safety, improve harmonisation and provide a level playing field and, finally, address two ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) findings that were issued to the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).

ED Decision 2020/020/R Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Part-PERS — Update of the initial-training objectives for air traffic safety electronics personnel

AMC & GM to Part-PERS — Amendment 1

The objective of this Decision is to maintain a high and uniform level of safety by updating the acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance material (GM) for the initial training of air traffic safety electronics personnel (ATSEP). This is achieved by regularly harmonising the training scheme and competence assessment for ATSEP with the evolving EU regulatory framework, state of the art, and recognised best practices in aviation.

This Decision amends the AMC and GM to Subpart A of Annex XIII (Part-PERS) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373. More precisely, it updates the training objectives for ATSEP basic and qualification training syllabi and, therefore, improves the initial training content. It also introduces editorial and structural changes, provides updates of regulatory references, and makes improvements to AMC and GM that are not directly related to training objectives.

The amendments are expected to maintain safety and support providers of air traffic management/air navigation services (ATM/ANS) in developing, updating, and harmonising with EU rules their training syllabi.

FAA Notice 8900.571 Airworthiness and Operational Risk-Based Decision Making

This notice brings awareness to Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) safety inspectors of risk-based decision-making guidance and resources
that eliminate single-person decisions, supports the reestablishment of compliance, and provides
procedures to authorize alternative methods to continue safe operations as needed and as
appropriate. When operational and/or airworthiness issues are complex, difficult to determine, or
there is potential for controversy, Flight Standards (FS) employees will exercise risk-based
decision making and eliminate single-person decisions. This notice also provides awareness that
FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 60, Section 1, Risk-Based Decision Making
Airworthiness Directive Compliance, and Volume 3, Chapter 60, Section 2, Interdependent
Risk-Based Compliance and Management Decision Making, now reflect this expectation.

FAA N8900.571

Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.

FAA N8900.574 Revision to Repair Station OpSpecs A101 and D107 in Preparation for UK-EU Transition

This notice revises Operations Specifications (OpSpec) A101,
Additional Fixed Locations, and D107, Line Maintenance Authorization, for Title 14 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 145 certificated repair stations located within the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK). This notice provides revised guidance for
the responsible Flight Standards offices and International Field Offices (IFO).